Zionism's "One step back two steps forward" tactic
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
 
Other articles
 

As a result of its agreement with the American imperialism, the Israel state decided to and put in practice the withdrawal from all parts of Gaza and four settlements of West Bank in the name of "peace". Israel, which fully withdrawn from Gaza, left behind almost a wreck.

Having being considered positive by some circles, what really lies under the "withdrawal" action is nothing else then putting in practice the American-Israel, imperialist-Zionist plan. The realization of "withdrawal" is being described as return to the " plan in the Middle East. That is to say that the "Road Map", which means the legitimization of the Israeli occupation on the Palestinian lands, will again be putted in practice.

The head of American imperialism declared that the peace in the "holy country" became close reality by Israel's withdrawal from Gaza and some parts of the West Bank.

After these words of him, Bush proposed to "help Palestine in the fight against terrorism" in the content of threat and conditions. It means that the Palestinian people should not fight against the occupation, Zionism and imperialism for the sake of a peace in the "holy country" that he (Bush) calls. Fighting for the liberation of Palestine is being named as terrorism. This is the imposition and condition. Thus, American imperialism says that there will be a peace only if you accept what is corresponding to my interests and what I have offered you, the other is terrorism.

We also understand the meaning of the withdrawal from Sharon's following words:

"The unilateral withdrawal plan has got only one phase. There is no other phrase coming after the now-ended phrase (85) I want to repeat and rather clearly state: Israel accepted the Road Map only together with additions that we made. For us to consider and implement the Road Map, first the Palestinians have got to fully back down from terrorism, using force and provocations. Moreover, it is necessary for them to crush terrorist organisations and collect their weapons. They made a set of reforms in their security mechanisms. I still consider these reforms as the security-terror organisations (85) I am not intending to cease from this even one millimetre."

As Bush, the butcher Sharon is also planning to led Palestinians to kill each other in order to ensure the "peace" and states that it is the first and the last "withdrawal".

Israel has "withdrawn" from the said territories in order to make the large part of the Palestinian lands, of which it continues to occupy and have strategic importance from all sides, as forever the Israel land. Israel made one step back in order to make two steps forward. There is no doubt that this "withdrawal" can be interpreted in many forms. But what is determining the content of the interpretation is the form of perspective that the question is being reviewed. This withdrawal can be seen as the consequence of the armed struggle, the resistance, but it can also be seen as the consequence of the Palestinian Authorities' reconciliation with Zionism and so the USA. However, it can also be seen as the necessity of the USA-Israel plan which will be implemented. In any case and for all point of views, the withdrawal cannot be seen as a step that is being taken to bring peace to Palestine, or for the independence of Palestine.

What situation are we now face to face with?

- Israel withdraws fully from Gaza Strip in order to never get out from the occupied West Bank territories. Israel withdraws only from four settlements in the West Bank. And its permanent remaining in the West Bank's occupied territories is being guaranteed by the USA.

- Through the tactic of "withdrawal", Israel kept the Palestine Authority under pressure. Now the Palestine Authority is face to face with showing that it is on the side of peace, capable to form and govern the state.

- Taking out settlers (occupiers) from the Palestinian lands in just few days is being considered as a factor that shows how the state of Israel is determined in the case of "withdrawal". That is to say that the Palestinian Authority must also be determined in the fight against terrorism as much as Israel.

- This situation partially has help amelioration of the butcher Sharon's murderer image in the world. Sharon counts that he will be remembered through his audacious steps for "peace", but not with his massacres in Sabra and Shatilla.

- Through this tactic of him, the butcher Sharon gained a new trump card. Now he says to the Palestinian Authority that I ventured and successfully practiced to clash with my "extremists" and take them out of the Palestinian lands. Now you should finish those 'indifadaists' (upraisers).

In order to prevent 'Middleeasternazation' of the resistance in Iraq or before its 'Middleeasternized', the American imperialism has taken the obedient Palestinian Administration under pressure and imposed a "peace" on the basis of its own conditions. They need such a "peace", because they want to present the Palestinian question as an exemplary solution on the way of practising the "Greater Middle East Project". On the other hand, preventing the interference of the EU in the question must also be seen as another factor in the USA's search for solution.

Both the Zionist Israel and the American imperialism want to turn Palestinian Administration into a puppet. They try the Administration to practice their own plans. But there is one point they forget: The first Intifada erupted in 1987, in a period when the weakening of the Palestinian resistance was a common idea. And in a period when 'Arafatist' submission was taken to the sky after Oslo agreement (1993), the non-application of obedient conciliation -at the end- caused eruption of the second intifada (2000). The occupants are forgetting that putting in practice the plan of dividing Palestine forever through such "withdrawal" will cause the eruption of the third intifada.
 

 

Archive

 

2020
January
2019
December November
October September
August July
June May
April March
February

 

Zionism's "One step back two steps forward" tactic
fc Share on Twitter
 

As a result of its agreement with the American imperialism, the Israel state decided to and put in practice the withdrawal from all parts of Gaza and four settlements of West Bank in the name of "peace". Israel, which fully withdrawn from Gaza, left behind almost a wreck.

Having being considered positive by some circles, what really lies under the "withdrawal" action is nothing else then putting in practice the American-Israel, imperialist-Zionist plan. The realization of "withdrawal" is being described as return to the " plan in the Middle East. That is to say that the "Road Map", which means the legitimization of the Israeli occupation on the Palestinian lands, will again be putted in practice.

The head of American imperialism declared that the peace in the "holy country" became close reality by Israel's withdrawal from Gaza and some parts of the West Bank.

After these words of him, Bush proposed to "help Palestine in the fight against terrorism" in the content of threat and conditions. It means that the Palestinian people should not fight against the occupation, Zionism and imperialism for the sake of a peace in the "holy country" that he (Bush) calls. Fighting for the liberation of Palestine is being named as terrorism. This is the imposition and condition. Thus, American imperialism says that there will be a peace only if you accept what is corresponding to my interests and what I have offered you, the other is terrorism.

We also understand the meaning of the withdrawal from Sharon's following words:

"The unilateral withdrawal plan has got only one phase. There is no other phrase coming after the now-ended phrase (85) I want to repeat and rather clearly state: Israel accepted the Road Map only together with additions that we made. For us to consider and implement the Road Map, first the Palestinians have got to fully back down from terrorism, using force and provocations. Moreover, it is necessary for them to crush terrorist organisations and collect their weapons. They made a set of reforms in their security mechanisms. I still consider these reforms as the security-terror organisations (85) I am not intending to cease from this even one millimetre."

As Bush, the butcher Sharon is also planning to led Palestinians to kill each other in order to ensure the "peace" and states that it is the first and the last "withdrawal".

Israel has "withdrawn" from the said territories in order to make the large part of the Palestinian lands, of which it continues to occupy and have strategic importance from all sides, as forever the Israel land. Israel made one step back in order to make two steps forward. There is no doubt that this "withdrawal" can be interpreted in many forms. But what is determining the content of the interpretation is the form of perspective that the question is being reviewed. This withdrawal can be seen as the consequence of the armed struggle, the resistance, but it can also be seen as the consequence of the Palestinian Authorities' reconciliation with Zionism and so the USA. However, it can also be seen as the necessity of the USA-Israel plan which will be implemented. In any case and for all point of views, the withdrawal cannot be seen as a step that is being taken to bring peace to Palestine, or for the independence of Palestine.

What situation are we now face to face with?

- Israel withdraws fully from Gaza Strip in order to never get out from the occupied West Bank territories. Israel withdraws only from four settlements in the West Bank. And its permanent remaining in the West Bank's occupied territories is being guaranteed by the USA.

- Through the tactic of "withdrawal", Israel kept the Palestine Authority under pressure. Now the Palestine Authority is face to face with showing that it is on the side of peace, capable to form and govern the state.

- Taking out settlers (occupiers) from the Palestinian lands in just few days is being considered as a factor that shows how the state of Israel is determined in the case of "withdrawal". That is to say that the Palestinian Authority must also be determined in the fight against terrorism as much as Israel.

- This situation partially has help amelioration of the butcher Sharon's murderer image in the world. Sharon counts that he will be remembered through his audacious steps for "peace", but not with his massacres in Sabra and Shatilla.

- Through this tactic of him, the butcher Sharon gained a new trump card. Now he says to the Palestinian Authority that I ventured and successfully practiced to clash with my "extremists" and take them out of the Palestinian lands. Now you should finish those 'indifadaists' (upraisers).

In order to prevent 'Middleeasternazation' of the resistance in Iraq or before its 'Middleeasternized', the American imperialism has taken the obedient Palestinian Administration under pressure and imposed a "peace" on the basis of its own conditions. They need such a "peace", because they want to present the Palestinian question as an exemplary solution on the way of practising the "Greater Middle East Project". On the other hand, preventing the interference of the EU in the question must also be seen as another factor in the USA's search for solution.

Both the Zionist Israel and the American imperialism want to turn Palestinian Administration into a puppet. They try the Administration to practice their own plans. But there is one point they forget: The first Intifada erupted in 1987, in a period when the weakening of the Palestinian resistance was a common idea. And in a period when 'Arafatist' submission was taken to the sky after Oslo agreement (1993), the non-application of obedient conciliation -at the end- caused eruption of the second intifada (2000). The occupants are forgetting that putting in practice the plan of dividing Palestine forever through such "withdrawal" will cause the eruption of the third intifada.